Home

How did the supreme court rule in the scott v. sandford case?

It ruled 7-2 in favor of Sandford and this was how the Supreme Court rule in the Scott versus Sandford case. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option A. The chief justice for this case was Roger B. Taney. I hope the answer has helped you In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories

How did the supreme court rule in the scott v

  1. Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred..
  2. The Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford did three important things: Established that enslaved persons had no rights in federal court Declared that slave states no longer had to honor the once free, always free rule
  3. The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford reached the Supreme Court in March 1857. By a vote of seven to two, the Court ruled that black people - either free or enslaved - were not citizens of the United States and, therefore did not have the right to sue in a federal court
  4. Dred Scott decision, formally Dred Scott v.John F.A. Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7-2) that a slave who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820.

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Scott v

The Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case declared that African Americans, no matter what their status were not American citizens The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permiting slavery in all of the country's territories. The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sandford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery. In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this.. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the United States Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for people of African descent, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and so the rights and privileges that the Constitution confers upon American citizens could not.

In which of these cases did the Supreme Court rule that a law passed by Congress was unconstitutional? Dred Scott v, Sandford in the case of plessy v Ferguson the supreme court ruled that state legislatures may pass laws that require the races to be separate from one another Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) This Supreme Court decision attempted to settle the legal status of slaves in free territories to avert a civil war, but it provoked one instead. Dred Scott, who was.. In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal.. However, the Missouri Supreme Court ordered the circuit court to take up the case again, and when it did so three years later, the court reversed its decision, ruling that the Scotts had been held illegally as slaves and were thus free Which best describes the status of slavery during the time of the Dred Scott case? Slavery was creating tension between the North and the South. Which was found to be unconstitutional based on the Supreme Court's ruling in Scott v.

The case was decided in favor of Sanford, but Dred Scott appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. Seven of the nine justices agreed that Dred Scott should remain a slave, but Taney did not stop there It ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, and that the state of slavery was legal and perpetual in all states of the union. It also found that blacks held as chattel were not included under the banner of citizenship. Chief Justic.. So the first question the Supreme Court had to decide was whether it had jurisdiction to rule over this case. If Scott had standing - that is, a legal right - then the Court had jurisdiction, and the justices could go on to decide the merits of his claim Get an answer for 'What questions did the Supreme Court address in the Dred Scott case? ' and find homework help for other Dred Scott v. Sandford questions at eNote

United States Supreme Court. DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD(1856) No. 38 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1856 [60 U.S. 393, 396] THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit Court by Scott against Sandford How did the Supreme Court rule in the Scott v Sandford case? In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 — decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court Dred Scott v. Sandford, otherwise known as the Dred Scott Decision, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1857 and seen as a landmark decision in the debate surrounding the constitutionality and legality of slavery.The decision of the court was that people who had entered the United States as slaves could not rely on the protection of the United States Constitution In conclusion, the Supreme Court decided Dred Scott could remain a slave, and that they did not support the limiting of slavery. 225 In Conclusion, the Dred Scott Decision took a long drawn out journey through the court system to be literally, and figuratively dismissed Missouri's Dred Scott Case, 1846-1857. In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott.

Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case - HISTOR

On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of the U.S. Supreme Court shared the majority opinion in the ruling of Dred Scott v. John Sandford. The Supreme Court ruled that slaves were not citizens of the United States and, therefore, could not expect any protection from the federal government or the courts The same was true for Scott's family members. The case, known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, entered the Missouri legal system in 1846. Scott won the initial case, but his owner appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the master. In 1857, the case reached the United States Supreme Court On March 6, 1857, in the case of Dred Scott v. John Sanford, United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled that African Americans were not and could not be citizens. Taney wrote that the Founders' words in the Declaration of Independence, all men were created equal, were never intended to apply to blacks In 1857, several months after President Buchanan took the oath of office, the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford.Dred Scott, born a slave in Virginia in 1795, had been one of the thousands forced to relocate as a result of the massive internal slave trade and taken to Missouri, where slavery had been adopted as part of the Missouri Compromise

Supreme Court Rules Black People Are Not Citizens. On March 6, 1857, in Dred Scott v. Sandford, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Black people were not American citizens and could not sue in courts of law. The Court ruled against Dred Scott, an enslaved Black man who tried to sue for his freedom. For years before this case began, Dred Scott was. This the Supreme Court held was error, and the judgment was reversed. The case of Dred Scott v. Emerson, 15 Missouri R. 682, March Term, 1852, will now be stated. This case involved the identical question before us, Emerson having, since the hearing, sold the plaintiff to Sandford, the defendant by Martin Magnusson, Editor-at-Large. This month marks the 150 th anniversary of the Supreme Court's infamous Dred Scott v. Sanford case, in which an African American slave sued for his freedom. Dred Scott's argument was that because he had been brought into free territories, he could not be returned to the bonds of slavery Dred Scott Wins His Freedom. Dred Scott Decision: Impact On Civil War. Sources. The Dred Scott case, also known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, was a decade-long fight for freedom by a Black enslaved. Dred Scott v. Sandford(1857) Court's Decision: In March of 1857, Scott lost the decision as seven out of nine Justices on the Supreme Court declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen, or ever had been a U.S. citizen. As a non-citizen, the court stated, Scott had no rights and could not sue in a Federal Court and must.

How did the Supreme Court define Dred Scott How did the Court interpret the Constitution on this score? In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 — decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court Chief Justice Taney somewhat naively believed that he was settling the question of slavery once and for all in the case of Dred Scott v Sanford (1857).Slavery had been a running sore in American. Dred Scott vs. Sandford was a crucial ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case wherein the court held that U.S. citizenship of Black persons, whether slaves or free, did not come under the scope of the U.S. Constitution & that the liberties and rights accorded to U.S. residents can not be applied to black people These are the 7 famous Supreme Court cases that have defined a nation. Marbury v. Madison. Dred Scott v. Sandford. Brown v. Board of Education. Mapp v. Ohio

Q. A political party formed to prevent the spred of slavery. Q. An Illinois lawyer who became the 16th President of the United States. Q. Controversial Supreme Court Case that led to all African Americans being declared noncitizens of the United States. Plessy v. Ferguson. Dred Scott v. Sandford In 1850 a Missouri court gave Scott his freedom, but two years later, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed this decision and returned Scott to slavery. Scott then appealed to the federal courts. For five years, the case proceeded through the federal courts. For more than a year, the Court withheld its decision http://sites.mnhs.org/civil-war/ Law Professor Lea Vandervelde (University of Iowa) explains the U.S. Supreme Court's 1857 decision, based in part on the Dre.. Answers: 2 on a question: Which was a provision of the supreme court's ruling on the scott v. sandford case? a) enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit. b) free african americans could enjoy the same rights as other us citizens. c) slaveholders could only take enslaved workers into slave states or territories. d) the missouri compromise was constitutional and. Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the now infamous opinion of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case, and the text is available on this webpage. But six other justices concurred with the decision, and two dissented

Dred Scott v. Sandford: History, Decision, and Impact ..

1. This case has been twice argued. After the argument at the last term, differences of opinion were found to exist among the members of the court; and as the questions in controversy are of the highest importance, and the court was at that time much pressed by the ordinary business of the term, it was deemed advisable to continue the case, and direct a re-argument on some of the points, in. DRED SCOTT. In 1857, several months after President Buchanan took the oath of office, the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford.Dred Scott (), born a slave in Virginia in 1795, had been one of the thousands forced to relocate as a result of the massive internal slave trade and taken to Missouri, where slavery had been adopted as part of the Missouri Compromise

On March 6, 1857, the Supreme Court delivered its ruling in the form of Chief Justice Taney's Majority Opinion of the Court. The Court dismissed the case of. Scott v. Sandford due to lack of jurisdiction, yet it still ruled on the merits of the case, outlining its decisions on them in Taney's Majority Opinion. The Supreme Court The 1857 result of Dred Scott v. Sandford in the Supreme Court produced a reaction so dramatic and intense that many believe it was one of the sparks that lit the fires of civil war. And, at the core of it all, was a very real man and his family fighting for their freedom. This is the messed up truth about the Dred Scott case Dred Scott V. Sandford's Case In The History Of The Supreme Court 1559 Words | 7 Pages. Dred Scott v. Sandford is one of the darkest cases in the history of the Supreme Court. After years of slavery, parts of the United States were beginning to head in a direction away from slavery This case explores the legal concept of due process. In 1834, Dred Scott, an enslaved person, was purchased in Missouri and then brought to Illinois, a free (non-slave) state. He later moved with his enslaver to present-day Minnesota, where slavery had been recently prohibited, and then back to Missouri The 1857 Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford inflamed sectional tensions over slavery and propelled the United States toward civil war. In this video, Kim discusses the case with scholars Christopher Bracey and Timothy Huebner

Dred Scott Case House Divide

Dred Scott decision Definition, History, Summary

Dred Scott v. Sandford is a landmark case announced by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 6, 1857, which ruled that blacks were not United States citizens. As a result, blacks were not afforded government or court protection, and Congress could no longer ban slavery from a federal territory v. Canter (1 Peters, 511) referred to and examined, showing that the decision in this case is not in conflict with that opinion, and that the court did not, in the case referred to, decide upon the construction of the clause of the Constitution above mentioned, because the case before them did not make it necessary to decide the question. • 3 Sandford (1857) found on PBS.org clearly summarizes the controversy of the Dred Scott case, whose roots reach back to 1833, when Scott's master purchased and eventually moved Scott from slave to free states. His death led to Scott to sue for his freedom, and this case eventually rose to the Supreme Court

To make sure that all former slaves were able to find jobs. In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court said that African Americans ______________. This act allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state, and Maine as a free state. It drew a boundary line to separate northern free states and southern slave states. Q (Scott v. Sandford 1875). When the Dred Scott case came to the Supreme Court, the nation was in a time of great divide, with pro and antislavery groups arguing about whether new states should enter the nation as slave states, where slavery was legal, or free states, where slavery was illegal The case of Scott v. Stanford (often misspelled through a clerical error in the Supreme Court) was decided in 1857. Taney's majority opinion still ranks as one of. The Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) case was so controversial because not only did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that African Americans were recognized as.. After the first session of oral argument in the Scott case, in the spring of 1856, Justice Nelson authored a draft majority opinion which held that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to hear Scott's case against Sandford, because Scott had admitted in the case that he was a slave and as a slave Missouri did not recognize him as a citizen

Professors Christopher Bracey and Martha Jones talked about the background of the 1857 Supreme Court case [Dred Scott v. Sandford], in which the court sided 7-2 with slavery and declared that Dred. Want a specific SCOTUS case covered? Your idea gets picked when you donate on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeatMr. Beat's band: http://electricneedl..

Interpret the reactions to the Dred Scott v. Sanford court case from several historical perspectives and consider the case's role in the sectional crisis over slavery and the 1860 election. (CO#4, CO#5, CO#6/Gen. Ed. Outcome 4.2) The 1857 Supreme Court decision Scott v. Sandford was significant in the decade preceding the Civil War The Supreme Court's 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional; angry Republicans said this decision threatened to make slavery a national institution. History of the United States-Wikipedi In United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court ruled that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. In a 5 to 4 vote, the court ruled that DOMA violated the rights of gays and lesbians. The court also ruled that the law interferes with the states' rights to define marriage. It was the first case ever on the issue of gay. These constitutional issues brought by the case Scott v. Sandford were of great historical and modern day importance, and revolutionized the judicial system till this day. Decision. In the infamous Supreme Court Case, Dred Scott v. Stanford, the court ruled in favor of Stanford, overturning the lower court's decision

The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was first heard by the Supreme Court on February 11-14, 1856, and reargued on December 15-18, 1856. Dred Scott's lawyers reiterated their earlier argument that because he and his family had resided in the Louisiana territory, Scott was legally free and was no longer enslaved The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom The U.S. Supreme Court precisely 164 years ago on March 6, 1857 in the Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford case declared that Blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect courts. However, by the time Scott's case made it to trial, U.S. political sentiments had changed and it took 11 years for his case to reach the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford remains among its most controversial. Slavery was at the root of Dred Scott's case

THE DRED SCOTT CASE (1857) Performance Standard 16BUS.I Answer questions and write an explanation regarding the constitutional principles and results of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) accordingly: • Knowledge: Describe the constitutional principles and results of the Dred Scott v. Sandford case List of some of the major causes and effects of the Dred Scott decision, the 1857 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court that made slavery legal in all U.S. territories. The decision increased antislavery sentiment in the North and fed the sectional strife that eventually led to civil war in 1861 At his inauguration on March 4, 1857, James Buchanan endorsed the Supreme Court's upcoming decision in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford.Scott was an enslaved African-American man who had sued. 1. Briefly describe the background of Dred Scott v. Sandford. (1 point) Dred Scott, a black slave who resided in the free state of Illinois and Wisconsin's free territories, appealed to the Supreme Court in an effort to grant his freedom before moving back to Missouri's slave state. The dispute surrounding the case was that the slaves were property, that they were not citizens, and that they. The ruling in the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v Sandford changed all that. Eighty years of compromising (beginning with the Constitutional Convention) down the drain. In one fell swoop, the primary tool of compromise, a line by which it was determined which states would enter the Union as slave states, and which would enter as free states.

Following is the case brief for Dred Scott v. Sandford, Supreme Court of the United States, (1857) Case Summary of Dred Scott v. Sandford: Dred Scott was a slave who moved to a free state with the consent of his then master (Emerson). When Emerson died, Scott tried to purchase both the freedom of himself and his family, but the estate refused On March 6, 1857, in its Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Scott, a slave who had spent part of his life in non-slave territory, could not sue for his freedom in a federal court because, as the March 7 New York Times summarized, Negroes, whether slaves or free, that is, men of the African race, are not citizens of the United States by the Constitution On its way to the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott case grew in scope and significance as slavery became the single most explosive issue in American politics. By the time the case reached the high court, it had come to have enormous political implications for the entire nation. On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney read the majority. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) Supreme Court decision, 7-2. The featured image depicts Dred Scott (right) and Roger B. Taney (left), the latter of whom was the author of the majority opinion in the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision. Both images are in the public domain, and both are courtesy of Wikimedia Commons The Supreme court's arguments and strategies were in the favor of Sandford. they argued that they could not entertain Scott's case because courts of ¨peculiar and limited jurisdiction¨ may only hear cases brought by select parties involving limited claims. for example, under article iii of the U.S. constitution.The court ruled that because Scott was a ¨negro¨ there for his ancestor were.

The Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v

After 11 years of cases in the circuit court and Missouri Supreme Court, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1855. The case, Dred Scott v. Sandford (the court misspelled the name of John Sanford, Mrs. Emerson's brother, who had assumed control of the case) was argued in 1855 and again in December 1856 The case is Dred Scott vs. Sanford. Dred Scott had been a slave in Missouri, but later was moved by his master to Illinois, a free state, and later to part of the Louisiana territory above the. The Kentucky and Missouri Supreme Courts affirmed the death penalty in their respective cases. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was no national consensus regarding whether executing those under 18 years old is cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment. Stanford v. Kentucky Case Brief. Statement of the Facts Scott v Sandford was effectively overruled, not by a later Supreme Court decision, but by enactment of the 13 th, 14 th, and 15 th Amendments. Before that, it was largely ignored. For example, in June of 1862, Congress passed a law abolishing slavery in the federal territories—and no member of Congress even mention the Dred Scott decision.

Dred Scott case: the Supreme Court decision - PB

In 1853, Scott once again sued for his freedom, this time in Federal court. This is referred to as the Scott v. Sandford case because Emerson's brother, John Sandford, took over. responsibility for the case. When the Missouri Supreme Court once again ruled that Scott was a slave, he appealed this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court decides Dred Scott case, March 6, 1857. On this day in 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7 to 2 that all AfricanAmericans living in the United States — slaves as well as free.

Dred Scott Case - Decision, Definition & Impact - HISTOR

Taney would ultimately fail and the Reconstruction Amendments would dash Taney's opinion in Dred Scott v Sandford, but not before the case was forever cast as a Supreme Court decision gone wrong. The Scotts' great great granddaughter, Lynne Jackson , is joined by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota to tell. The landmark Supreme Court cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas have had a tremendous effect on the struggle for equal rights in America. These marker cases have set the precedent for cases dealing with the issue of civil equality for the last 150 years The Supreme Court of North Carolina, in the case of the State v. Manuel, (4 Dev. and Bat., 20,) has declared the law of that State on this subject, in terms which I believe to be as sound law in the other States I have enumerated, as it was in North Carolina SHOW ANSWER. In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Thanks In 1857, the United States Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford took place that changed America as we know it. This case brought up the issues of slavery and the future of the US. It brought to light the important responsibility politicians have in making important decisions that can affect the future

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD (1857) He sued, citing the post-Civil War Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments supporting equality for blacks. The Supreme Court turned him down, saying that separate but equal accommodations did not violate the law. Separate but equal was the rule of the land before this decision came along

US History High School: Dred Scott V

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedi

Why did the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision anger Northerners? It made slavery legal in the territories. It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery. It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North. (my answer) It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories. . . When Emerson died in 1843, Scott sued Emerson's widow for his freedom in the Missouri supreme court, claiming that his residence in the ?free soil? of Illinois made him a free man. After defeat in State courts, Scott brought suit in a local federal court. Eleven years after Scott's initial suit, the case came before the U.S. Supreme Court Marbury v. Madison (1803) This case is probably the most important case in the history of the Supreme Court. With this case the Supreme Court claimed the power of judicial review. This is the power to declare laws made by Congress unconstitutional. This power was not given to the Supreme Court by the Constitution. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819

PPT - Dred Scott v

In March of 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise - a federal statute that regulated slavery in several western territories of the country - in the infamous Dred Scott Decision, 60 U.S. 393 (1857). The justices also addressed whether a former slave was considered a citizen of the. The Supreme Court did something out of character. In the midst of all this uncertainty, they took Scott v. Sandford and decided to make a ruling on this controversial issue (Pearson Education Inc. 2005). Analyzing Scott v. Sandford is helpful in concluding the extent Supreme Court rulings should reflect popular opinion

Dred Scott Case, argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1856-57. It involved the then bitterly contested issue of the status of slavery in the federal territories. In 1834, Dred Scott, a black slave, personal servant to Dr. John Emerson, a U.S. army surgeon, was taken by his master from Missouri, a slave state, to Illinois, a free state, and. The 1850s were a period marred by an intensifying sectional crisis between the North and South. One of the maincauses of this sectional tension was slavery, as northerners and southerners had diametrically opposed views on the subject. In 1856, the United States Supreme Court heard the case of Scott v. Sandford, which was a lawsuit in which a Missouri slave, Dred Scott, sued his master, John. Dred Scott V. Sandford was a lawsuit filed in 1846 by Dred Scott, an African- American slave 800 Words | 4 Pages. Dred Scott V. Sandford was a lawsuit filed in 1846 by Dred Scott, an African- American slave because he wanted to gain freedom not only for himself but for his family. This case became a landmark legal case in the United States history Dred Scott v. Sanford was a 1857 Supreme Court case in which a slave, Dred Scott, tried to sue for his freedom on the grounds that his master moved him to a free territory. The judge ruled against Scott in what is often considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in American History. In the Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court ruled that The Dred Scott case of the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied Scott his freedom by ruling that negro-slave descendants were not U.S. citizens, was the end of years of legal cases during 1846-1857, in lower federal district court and Missouri courts which had granted Dred Scott freedom for about 2 years, until over Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), known as the Dred Scott Case or the Dred Scott Decision, was a lawsuit decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1857.It is considered by many to have been a key cause of the American Civil War, and of the later ratification of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, leading to the.